Index of all articles, click
here
By Jan Garanoz (2011)
The simple truth is that when viewed on a global scale, American and European feminism is anti-women.
A world-wide social order that would allow rich men from anywhere in the world to enter and maintain polygamous marriages anywhere in the world would be very much in the interest of poor girls and women in many countries, and in the interest of their families, and in the interest of the governments of poor countries.
Happy people everywhere. Happy rich men, happy wives from poor families, happy poor families, happy governments.
There is really only one camp that will not just be unhappy but mad as hell about this idea: Western feminists
Because, in reality, all that Western feminists are fighting for is to have their men for themselves.
Just like the labor unions (trade unions) on the docks of US ports, feminists have only one genuine concern: to guard their interests, and TO KEEP COMPETITION OUT.
To admit to this would, of course, make feminism look like a cheap ideology (which, of course, it is).
To mask their plain agenda of protecting their interests, feminists come up with all kinds of lofty principles: human rights, female dignity, and more bullshit of a similar kind.
To divert the discussion away from their true motive of protecting sexual interests, many issues are invented: cross-border or cross-cultural sexual relationships are labeled trafficking; all relationships with a substantial wealth and age gap are dubbed exploitation; polygamy, which by all anthropological standards has been natural for human societies since there were humans, is branded slavery. And of course, "real" feminists view all sexual conduct of men as rape.
For centuries, feminist ideology, a.k.a. female morality, aided by the ever looming danger of venereal disease, thrived with Christianity.
And then, the political philosophy of the Age of Enlightenment, with its focus on equality, was easily instrumentalized by feminism.
The political philosophy of the Age of Enlightenment originally served as ideology for the emancipation of the bourgeois in a world ruled be hereditary nobility. Like all ideology, it shouldn't be taken all too serious.
Nevertheless, this ideology has creped into to constitutions of most countries, and rules the United Nations.
Western feminism has to be recognized as what it is: cheap laborunionism (tradeunionism) of mostly aging and not-so-attractive Western women who want to protect their sexual interests, and keep out the competition arising from willing young women in Third World countries.
Girls and women in Third World countries should beware. Western feminists who come with NGOs are not your sisters. They are your natural enemy.
Index of articles, click here.
Copyright Jan Garanoz