Index of all articles, click
here
By Jan Garanoz (2011)
Even so it contradicts political dogma, I have to point out that men and women are not the same.
More specifically, and for good reason, nature has equipped men with more sexual desire, or libido.
The mechanisms of procreation, for all life including human, are geared towards optimal adaptation. And if procreation is sexual, then these mechanisms include the survival of the fittest and natural and sexual selection.
For such mechanisms to work optimally, the seeds of the best adapted male will have to be spread to as many females as possible. As an inclination to make this happen, men, and males of many other animals, have a sex drive which typically is more pronounced than that of women, or females of other animals.
The natural procreative strategy of human females, or the females of other animals, on the other hand, is geared more towards protecting fertilization. It makes no biological sense for females to aim for copulation with a large number of men, and for this reason, females do not need a sex drive equal to that of men, and they are not equipped with it.
This libido imbalance is, for example, represented in, or caused by, hormone levels which different for men and women. Human males, and the males of other animals, have, compared to females, much higher levels of testosterone, the hormone of sexual desire. And men feel a decline of testosterone as a major negative impact on the quality of their lives (which explains the popularity of the testosterone-booster tongkat ali).
The trade-off in which females grant sexual access to males (even when not sexually aroused as much as men), and in exchange receive protection, is well established in anthropology and evolutionary psychology, and this is an equation that modern culture cannot supersede.
Culture can only modify the forms in which the imbalance of male and female libido presents itself.
Feminism is the ideology of restricting male sexuality. Feminism tells females that all sexual conduct that is not initiated on the basis of female sexual desire automatically is rape.
This is why the concept of marital rape is so important to feminism. And this is why feminists define it as prostitution when young women receive gifts from rich men. And why the concept of statutory rape is applied to ever more scenarios.
While it is natural that men compete with each other, they have good reason to unite against feminism. For feminism equally hurts all men. And young men, especially in poor countries, suffer most from this (in that they can't even get a wife).
American feminists who come with NGOs to poor countries in Asia and Africa (often together with Christian missionaries) really have only one agenda: to implement sexual restrictions on men
To achieve such sexual restrictions, Western feminist NGOs lobby governments in Asian and African countries to pass legislation against traditional marriages, or to make all marriages more difficult to establish, and to outlaw all sorts of sexual opportunities for men.
Because feminist NGOs and feminist United Nations agencies operate directly in opposition to the sexual interests of men in Asian and African countries, public male anger in countries as different as Afghanistan and Nigeria, or Egypt and Cambodia, is more and more directed against Christian women in NGOs who are the vanguard of cultural imperialism.
Feminists go home!
Index of articles, click here.
Copyright Jan Garanoz